Your message dated Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:00:04 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#220584: 2.3.2-ds110 segfault on VIA Samuel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2003 13:43:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 13 07:43:42 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zux221-024-146.adsl.green.ch (mail.granitsoft.ch) [81.221.24.146]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKHl7-0005BZ-00; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:43:41 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.granitsoft.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEE6222EE6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:43:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 192.168.0.99 (unknown [192.168.0.99])
by mail.granitsoft.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBE7222EE2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:43:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: granitsoft.ch
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: upgrade to 2.3.2.ds1-10 makes everything linked to libpthread segfault
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:43:32 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1;
boundary="Boundary-02=_Lq4s/V3Kkskz044";
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p3 (Debian) at granitsoft.ch
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--Boundary-02=_Lq4s/V3Kkskz044
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Tags: sid
Severity: important
Yo!
I saw #218546 and #216466 - It feels a bit like the first one. (So, to me i=
t=20
feels like Severity: critical - but since it's just on one system I won't d=
o=20
that)
After installing (which, like in 218546 goes through without error) the new=
=20
libc6, all programs linked to libpthread (which includes tar, so there's no=
=20
going back with dpkg. And ls, and a lot of other small tools you're used=20
to...) segfault. (thank god ln and ssh don't, so I can restore the old libc=
).=20
2.3.2-9 works. 2.3.2.ds1-{4,8,10} don't work.
Kernel is 2.4.22 (with a few patches from kernel-patch-xxx packages from=20
unstable).
=46unny thing is: a second system, with almost the same kernel, doesn't hav=
e the=20
problem. Diff between the kernel configs is below.
Problem: both systems are quite a mix between stable/testing/unstable softw=
are=20
(we'd like to use stable, but we need current php and samba. And we like=20
using the Debian packages, since it's so much easier...), and absolutely no=
t=20
in the same state, so you'll have to ask questions about installed software=
-=20
I've no idea where to look for the problems.
I can tweak the system which broke. The other one is a production machine=20
which I don't want to touch too much.
cheers
=2D- vbi
Hmmm. Diff between the kernel versions doesn't tell me anything (only=20
difference is some modules, but none of these is loaded)
however, gcc build environment used to build the kernels was different:
this kernel works:
$ cat /proc/version=20
Linux version 2.4.22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 20031005 (Debian=20
prerelease)) #3 SMP Thu Oct 23 08:03:53 CEST 2003
this one doesn't:
cat /proc/version=20
Linux version 2.4.22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 (Debian)) #2 SMP Don=
=20
Nov 6 16:03:21 CET 2003
with both kernels:
#
# Processor type and features
#
CONFIG_LOLAT=3Dy
CONFIG_LOLAT_SYSCTL=3Dy
CONFIG_M586=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_XADD=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=3Dy
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=3D5
CONFIG_X86_USE_STRING_486=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE=3Dy
CONFIG_X86_MCE=3Dy
CONFIG_MICROCODE=3Dm
CONFIG_X86_MSR=3Dm
CONFIG_X86_CPUID=3Dm
CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=3Dy
CONFIG_MTRR=3Dy
CONFIG_SMP=3Dy
CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK=3Dy
(other are not set)
Also: machine that works:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo=20
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 11
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1200MHz
stepping : 1
doesn't work:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo=20
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 7
model name : VIA Samuel 2
stepping : 3
=2D-=20
To stand and be still,
At the Birkenhead drill,
Is a damned tough bullet to chew.
-- Rudyard Kipling
--Boundary-02=_Lq4s/V3Kkskz044
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iKcEABECAGcFAj+ziotgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6nDsAn0IX6cXaHv5fvSBVs9gpra1a
LKd5AJ9sJk1aiTJbeYlt8CZpt3VBsjyB4g==
=gjin
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Boundary-02=_Lq4s/V3Kkskz044--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 220584-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 07:00:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 01 23:00:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay3sr-00077i-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:00:05 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B862ADEDF8; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:00:04 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:00:04 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#220584: 2.3.2-ds110 segfault on VIA Samuel
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level:
At Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:45:29 +0100,
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> This is just to notify you that I no longer have this hw available. So feel
> free to do what you want with this bug.
OK, I close this bug for a while - I still think this is not actual
glibc bug as Daniel thought. If someone find this is really problem,
please reopen and contact us.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
