Your message dated Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:43:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239063: linux-kernel-headers: error in sigcontext.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2004 16:47:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 20 08:47:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 69-188.umenet.t3.se (ankpelle.hpc2n.umu.se) [80.244.69.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B4jcl-0005vg-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 08:47:03 -0800
Received: by ankpelle.hpc2n.umu.se (Postfix, from userid 2089)
id 6FECE2D95D; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:46:58 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Torkelsson?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux-kernel-headers: error in sigcontext.h
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.53
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:46:57 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15
Severity: normal
/usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h includes the following line:
struct _fpstate __user * fpstate;
which looks somewhat wrong to me, and which also gives me an error when
trying to compile the latest arla snapshot.
Shouldn't it be:
struct _fpstate * fpstate;
which is what is in kernel 2.4.25 (the original line on the other hand
is in 2.6.4) for i386. x86_64 have the second line in both 2.4.25 and
2.6.4.
/torkel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 239063-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2004 14:43:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 22 06:43:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B5Qe2-0005Uy-00; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:43:14 -0800
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian))
id 1B5Qe1-0005Fu-UN
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:43:13 -0500
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:43:13 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#239063: linux-kernel-headers: error in sigcontext.h
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 12:04:15AM +0100, Bj�rn Torkelsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 12:57 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Bj�rn Torkelsson wrote:
> > > Package: linux-kernel-headers
> > > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h includes the following line:
> > >
> > > struct _fpstate __user * fpstate;
> > >
> > > which looks somewhat wrong to me, and which also gives me an error when
> > > trying to compile the latest arla snapshot.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't it be:
> > >
> > > struct _fpstate * fpstate;
> >
> > Why is not /usr/include/linux/compiler.h taking care of this for you?
> > It's included at the top of asm/sigcontext.h.
>
> Thats a good question.
>
> Hm, why the **** is arla doing a CFLAGS="-I /usr/src/linux/include"
> before running configure. That should not be needed when building the
> userland part of arla. Guess I should file a bug against arla instead.
Not a kernel headers bug then.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
