Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:56:19 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231998: libc6: xine segfaults using tls libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2004 06:56:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 22:56:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-207-112-23-170.tor.primus.ca (corum.multiverse.ca) [207.112.23.170]
(mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AqRob-00054b-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:56:13 -0800
Received: from igor by corum.multiverse.ca with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AqRoK-00014r-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 01:55:56 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 01:55:51 -0500
From: Igor Khavkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6: xine segfaults using tls libc6
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: libc6: xine segfaults using tls libc
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
A strange but very reproducible bug (at least for me). I can only
see this bug in xine. I have xine-ui 0.9.23-2. Here's how to reproduce
it:
1) start xine
2) bring out the gui (default skin if that matters)
3) hover over any button that has a tool tip
4) move the mouse while the tool tip is still on the screen
The result is a segfault. If the mouse is moved only after the
tool tip disapears, no segfault. Using GDB the segfault seems
to occur in thread #11. The place where the error takes place
(to the best of my investigation) is
0x40430b38 in _Unwind_Find_FDE () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
I can only reproduce this bug on one of my machines (athlon, kernel
2.6.2), and only using the TLS libc6 (libc6 or libc6-i686). This
bug does not show up with libc6-dbg or any of the following
configurations: athlon, kernel 2.4.18; k6-III, kernel 2.6.1.
I'm happy to provide more debug information if needed.
Igor
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231998-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2004 06:56:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 23:56:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BF6E0-0007wy-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:56:20 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1F6E2DEB58; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:56:19 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:56:19 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "GOTO Masanori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#231998: libc6: xine segfaults using tls libc6
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
At Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:19:49 -0400,
Igor Khavkine wrote:
> DATE: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:48:36
> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Igor Khavkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >Try to use 2.6.3. I guess it's not glibc, but kernel bug.
>
> I finally got around to upgrading to a new kernel.
> The bug is no longer reproducible with kernel 2.6.5.
> It seems this was a kernel bug.
OK, so I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
