At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:57:03 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > The attached dpatch was used to close this bug. But its comment is not > accurate, this dpatch adds a et_EE.ISO-8859-15 locale (and is then > identical to upstream fix) whereas bug log and dpatch comment seem > to imply that et_EE charset was changed from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15. > > Denis > [2 locale-et_EE.dpatch <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>] > #! /bin/sh -e > > # All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch. > # DP: Description: List et_EE with charset ISO-8859-15 as a supported locale
"Change default charset for et_EE locale from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15." is acceptable? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
