On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 07:44:53PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > That's why in my message I described doing a diff > between /etc/locale.gen and /etc/locale.gen.orig or similar to determine > what was changed in /etc/locale.gen. Am I missing something? [...] an in the message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The way it is done currently is BUGGY, in my opinion. Local > configuration should be obeyed and preserved, but I also feel Debconf > configuration should be obeyed and preserved... if it's not, what's the > point of Debconf? It's not just a GUI.
This is the so called "Debconf is not a registry" issue. It is discussed again on debian-devel, please give your opinions in this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0404/msg01531.html Debian glibc maintainers follow what Debian developers currently consider as the best practices, so you should make your point there. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
