At Tue, 11 May 2004 05:47:06 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > >> And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't sure how > >> that would affect the other 10 architectures, and there were already lots > >> and lots of changes in the MU. > > > > Well, that and the fact that it's really a linux-kernel-headers bug, and > > that's where the fix belongs. > > > > lamont > > Its still better for util-linux to convert to 64bit file offset bits > even though with a fixed LKH that would be just wishlist.
Exactly. When we should confirm to the LSB, that means we should confirm to the LFS. I've put the patch into linux-kernel-headers cvs. Unfortunatelly Thiemo's patch is failed to apply for lkh cvs because asm.h is not existed. I fixed some parts. It'll be out after checking lkh related bugs. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
