Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2004 04:45:38 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space
than 2.3.2.ds1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2004 20:21:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 10 13:21:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep19.inet.fi [194.251.242.244]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BNHGn-0001Ww-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:01 -0700
Received: from zazu.vip.fi ([80.223.232.180]) by fep19.inet.fi with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:59 +0300
Received: from mufasa.vip.fi ([192.168.1.4])
by zazu.vip.fi with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BNHGk-0002XP-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:58 +0300
Received: from pahartik by mufasa.vip.fi with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BNHGg-0001Vu-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:54 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paavo Hartikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:51 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal
Changelog does not explain why previous version was 15 MB and current
version is 50 MB. Is it "not stripped" for some reason?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6.1 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248373-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2004 19:45:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 05 12:45:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BWh6p-0006NG-00; Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:45:39 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 747FEDEB58; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 04:45:38 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 04:45:38 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paavo Hartikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space
than 2.3.2.ds1-11
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
At Tue, 18 May 2004 11:18:40 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > James, could you look at to apply this patch for alpha? We need this
> > patch for libc6.1 on alpha (and maybe arm).
>
> I think this is a good idea. I asked Alan Modra about it again and he
> said he hadn't had time to look at it; if we wait for it to be applied
> to HEAD it may be a very long wait.
This bug is fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13, which should be compiled with
the fixed-binutils on alpha. I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
