Selon Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:53:54PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:32:34 +0200 (CEST), > > Fabien Carrion wrote: > > > I got a little suggestion for the package libc6-dbg. I used it for a > > > little while, and the principal limitation is that we can't debug > inside > > > the macros. So I would like to know if you planed to do an another > package > > > with the debugging symbols for the macros, I mean the gcc's options : > > > - -gdwarf-2 -g3 > > > > It's good idea for me. I don't know we can use DWARF2 level3 on all > > architectures, though. > > > > Daniel, how about adding this option? If it's easy to add simply this > > option, I welcome to use it. > > Sorry, I missed this message. > > It's easy to add. It will work on all platforms. However: > (A) it will be a huge increase in disk space > (B) is that really what the submitter needs? Probably they want to > debug the macros in their source rather than in glibc's source... > If you need to debug that deep into glibc, you probably want to rebuild > it yourself anyway.
Hi every body, I really need this feature, I want to debug in the libc macro. I don t know if there is a need to do a special package. Basically I just tried to compile my one package, but each time, it takes ages, and it never finished the compilation, because there was no space left on the disk. I bet it does not compile only one package, but various packages for various architectures. So if there is no package made, I would like to have a link on a documentation on how to compile properly the libc6 package on a debian... -- Fabien Carrion -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
