severity 265486 normal tags 265486 moreinfo thanks At 13 Aug 2004 13:25:17 -0000, Simon Rumble wrote: > Ack! Turns out it's a UML thing to do with NPTL. I apologise for > the hysteria, but it kinda seemed rather broken 8) > > Perhaps we could implement some kind of check for a UML kernel, at > least while they don't support NPTL/TLS?
At least we have not heard about UML problem with the 2.6 kernel. The current user-mode-linux 2.4 kernel and uml\* packages in debian works well. The recent modification for glibc from -13 to -16 is not so large. Please investigate more and report us the detailed information. If you don't have spare time to check it, and you have no objection, we'll close it. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
