On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:29:35AM +0100, Martijn Sipkema wrote: > [...] > > so there *is* a workaround for the bug. and i personally believe that > > JACK, at least, should be using the workaround. > > It's a pretty serious bug though, in that very basic functionality doesn't > not work correctly, and I personally wouldn't go out of my way to > program a workaround.
I agree. And it breaks correctly written existing code. I see no reason why this shouldn't be fixed ASAP. -- FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
