At Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:26:37 -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > GOTO> I prepared 2.3.2.ds1-16_ia64 compiling without > GOTO> -fomit-frame-pointer. It's added by debian/sysdeps/linux.mk. > GOTO> I put that version at: > > GOTO> http://www.gotom.jp/~gotom/debian/debian/glibc/2.3.2.ds1-16_ia64.fofp/ > > GOTO> David, could you check it? Unfortunatelly I have no > GOTO> permission to access chroot on ia64 to test this kind of > GOTO> problems. > > Thanks, but why ia64? My bug-report was for i386. There is no issue > for ia64 (where omit-frame-pointer is a no-op).
Oops. I didn't confirm which architecture was used. Plus I should know ia64 frame structure, too. > GOTO> I think it's good idea to drop -fomit-frame-pointer from > GOTO> linux.mk for building libc with NPTL. If such optimization > GOTO> option is fine for specific architecture, it should be defined > GOTO> -fomit-frame-pointer in debian/sysdeps/*.mk. > > Does this mean you plan on rebuilding the i386 glibc without > -fomit-frame-pointer? That would be fine with me. Yes, if it makes problem, and if it does not cause siginificant performance drop, I think it should be modified. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
