Your message dated Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:16:01 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc: bug in ftime
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 06:16:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 17 01:16:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip-a1-37024.keycomm.it (sparc.campana.vi.it) [62.152.37.24]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19d24G-000092-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 01:16:41 -0500
Received: from dirac.campana.vi.it (dirac.campana.vi.it [192.168.0.4])
by sparc.campana.vi.it (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 41561B9E1; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:16:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bott by dirac.campana.vi.it with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19d23z-0002dW-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:16:23 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc: bug in ftime
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ottavio Campana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:16:23 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
I've found a bug in libc using ftime. Give a look at this little code:
#include <sys/timeb.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
struct timeb tp;
float old_time = 0;
float new_time = 0;
#define PERFOMANCES ftime(&tp); \
new_time = tp.time + tp.millitm/1000; \
fprintf (stdout, "new: %f\n", new_time); \
fprintf (stdout, "Performances: delta=%f \n", \
new_time-old_time ); \
old_time = new_time;
int main (void) {
while (1) {
usleep (500000);
PERFOMANCES
}
}
Compiling and running it gives you:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ > ./test
new: 1058422400.000000
Performances: delta=1058422400.000000
new: 1058422400.000000
Performances: delta=0.000000
new: 1058422400.000000
Performances: delta=0.000000
new: 1058422400.000000
Performances: delta=0.000000
new: 1058422400.000000
Performances: delta=0.000000
new: 1058422400.000000
Performances: delta=0.000000
new: 1058422400.000000
Performances: delta=0.000000
It seems that time gets updated only the first time.
If you need to contact me my email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux dirac 2.4.21-dirac #1 SMP lun giu 23 08:07:23 CEST 2003 i686
unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201664-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2004 03:16:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 07 20:16:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFlEf-0002wu-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 20:16:01 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1D2A3DEB5E; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:16:01 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:16:01 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libc: bug in ftime
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
> I've found a bug in libc using ftime. Give a look at this little code:
>
(snip)
> #define PERFOMANCES ftime(&tp); \
> new_time = tp.time + tp.millitm/1000; \
> fprintf (stdout, "new: %f\n", new_time); \
> fprintf (stdout, "Performances: delta=%f \n", \
> new_time-old_time ); \
> old_time = new_time;
This code is broken. "millitm" is milli second resolution, so
tp.millitm/1000 is always 0.
> reassign 201664 libc6
> thanks
>
> ftime() is obsolete and buggy in many releases of libc. See its current
> manpage also. These days millitm could be broken again.
Wrong, ftime() works fine.
I close this bug because it's bogus.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
