Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:18:23 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277439: glibc should avoid using services listed in "services"
when picking a RPC port
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2004 00:04:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 19 17:04:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CK3xZ-0008Cm-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:04:09 -0700
Received: from bee.dooz.org (levallois.dooz.org [81.57.180.178])
by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E871E01BA;
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7293E680422B; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:04:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:04:06 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc should avoid using services listed in "services" when picking a RPC port
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.99.6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-18
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
As discussed on debina-devel below:
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/threads.html#00292>
it would be a nice thing to workaround the buginess of RPC services
port assignment in glibc. A simple solution would be to avoid using
ports listed in /etc/services first and use them if nothing else is
available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routin=
es [gl
-- no debconf information
Regards,
--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277439-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2004 03:18:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 19 20:18:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CK6zd-0002q3-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:18:29 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 48E9BDEB42; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:18:28 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:18:23 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#277439: glibc should avoid using services listed in "services" when
picking a RPC port
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:04:06 +0200,
Lo=EFc Minier wrote:
> As discussed on debina-devel below:
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/threads.html#00292>
> it would be a nice thing to workaround the buginess of RPC services
> port assignment in glibc. A simple solution would be to avoid using
> ports listed in /etc/services first and use them if nothing else is
> available.
This kind of discussion has been often come up, and finally it's not
accepted. Try google. Note that imagine if all privileged ports in
/etc/services is filled with entries. Your suggestion will be simply
failed. It's undesirable design feature. I close it.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
