Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:55:52 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204735: segfault in samba
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2003 19:29:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 09 14:29:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19lZPD-0003lp-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 14:29:35 -0500
Received: from pcp483125pcs.oakrdg01.tn.comcast.net 
(pcp04534741pcs.oakrdg01.tn.comcast.net[68.34.212.107](misconfigured sender))
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
          id <2003080919293401100cf2p9e>
          (Authid: jdfreels);
          Sat, 9 Aug 2003 19:29:34 +0000
Subject: bug in new libc6 causes samba to crash
From: "James D. Freels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-mCgzvGIKoHOu5oaRq+n+"
Organization: self
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 09 Aug 2003 15:29:33 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_10_20,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--=-mCgzvGIKoHOu5oaRq+n+
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-2

This bug will be cross-posted as a samba bug, since it only appears to
occur when samba is running.

The new version of libc6 causes samba-3.0.0beta2-1 to crash.

The fix is either to downgrade libc6 or do not run samba

Below is a samba debug dump sent to root

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug  9 10:31:46 2003
Return-Path: <postmaster>
Received: by fea_home
        via send-mail from stdin
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
        Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:31:46 -0400 (EDT) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:31:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zepp)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Segfault in Samba
Status: O

The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for pid 802 (/usr/sbin/smbd).

Below is a backtrace for this process generated with gdb, which shows
the state of the program at the time the error occured.  You are
encouraged to submit this information as a bug report to Debian.  For
information about the procedure for submitting bug reports , please see
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting or the reportbug(1) manpage.

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...0x4025ac25 in waitpid () from
/lib/libc.so.6
#0  0x4025ac25 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x401fb22b in strtold_l () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x0817eac5 in smb_panic ()
#3  0x0817e911 in process_exists ()
#4  0x0817194c in pidfile_pid ()
#5  0x081719d1 in pidfile_create ()
#6  0x081d5258 in main ()


-- 
James D. Freels, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--=-mCgzvGIKoHOu5oaRq+n+
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.7">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Package: libc6<BR>
Version: 2.3.2-2<BR>
<BR>
This bug will be cross-posted as a samba bug, since it only appears to occur when 
samba is running.<BR>
<BR>
The new version of libc6 causes samba-3.0.0beta2-1 to crash.<BR>
<BR>
The fix is either to downgrade libc6 or do not run samba<BR>
<BR>
Below is a samba debug dump sent to root<BR>
<BR>
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug&nbsp; 9 10:31:46 2003<BR>
Return-Path: &lt;postmaster&gt;<BR>
Received: by fea_home<BR>
        via send-mail from stdin<BR>
        id &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt; (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)<BR>
        Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:31:46 -0400 (EDT) <BR>
Message-Id: &lt;<A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>&gt;<BR>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:31:46 -0400 (EDT)<BR>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zepp)<BR>
To: <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A><BR>
Subject: Segfault in Samba<BR>
Status: O<BR>
<BR>
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,<BR>
was called for pid 802 (/usr/sbin/smbd).<BR>
<BR>
Below is a backtrace for this process generated with gdb, which shows<BR>
the state of the program at the time the error occured.&nbsp; You are<BR>
encouraged to submit this information as a bug report to Debian.&nbsp; For<BR>
information about the procedure for submitting bug reports , please see<BR>
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting or the reportbug(1) manpage.<BR>
<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...<BR>
(no debugging symbols found)...0x4025ac25 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6<BR>
#0&nbsp; 0x4025ac25 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6<BR>
#1&nbsp; 0x401fb22b in strtold_l () from /lib/libc.so.6<BR>
#2&nbsp; 0x0817eac5 in smb_panic ()<BR>
#3&nbsp; 0x0817e911 in process_exists ()<BR>
#4&nbsp; 0x0817194c in pidfile_pid ()<BR>
#5&nbsp; 0x081719d1 in pidfile_create ()<BR>
#6&nbsp; 0x081d5258 in main ()<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<PRE>-- 
James D. Freels, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</PRE>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-mCgzvGIKoHOu5oaRq+n+--


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204735-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2004 01:55:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 20 18:55:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CKSBG-0007ug-00; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:55:55 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D978DECC8
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:55:54 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:55:52 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#204735: segfault in samba
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:53:02 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Is this bug still appeared in the latest glibc and samba?  I guess
> even if we had the bug, this should be fixed these days.  If you have
> no objection, I'll close this bug.  Please check it out.

No one reports this problem more.  I guess it's fixed in the latest
version.  I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to