On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Could you please provide details about the problem of having the > symlinks in glibc? > > Is it that glibc has a versioned Replaces: base-files and dpkg removes > the symlink in base-files before installing the one from glibc, > creating a big window during which /lib64 does not exist at all?
glibc (libc6) does not replace base-files. Why should it? Last time I looked getting it into glibc I couldn't figure out where to change the rules files to put it in the package so I've never really tried this. Maybe Andreas still knows how he patched it? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
