Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:36:21 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown
exit code (132)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2004 21:37:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 01 13:37:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CZc9w-00039X-00; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:37:12 -0800
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id
iB1Lb1XE001569
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:37:01 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id iB1Lb0h5001567;
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:37:00 -0800
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:37:00 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit
code (132)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: fet
Version: 3.9.19-1
Severity: normal
fet fails to build on sparc. Duplicated with pbuilder. Not
release-critical since it never has.
dh_shlibdeps
ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132)
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/fet/usr/bin/fet' gave error exit status
1
dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256
full build log:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=fet&ver=3.9.19-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1101448389&file=log&as=raw
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283860-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2005 14:36:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 26 06:36:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtoHO-0001Ek-00; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:36:22 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AE31FDEB3B; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:36:21 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:36:21 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown
exit code (132)
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
> fet fails to build on sparc. Duplicated with pbuilder. Not
> release-critical since it never has.
>
> dh_shlibdeps
> ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132)
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/fet/usr/bin/fet' gave error exit
> status 1
> dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256
>
> full build log:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=fet&ver=3.9.19-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1101448389&file=log&as=raw
> Seems identical to #268450, thanks to Jurij Smakov for pointing that out.
#268450 says sparc ldd problem is kernel bug, not glibc. I close it.
BTW, I also send this message to #290772. Radu, please read comments
in #268450 from Jurij about sparc fet breakage. I think some buildd
for arm uses old kernel, so this problem is occured. I built fet
package on arm box which is (IIRC) 2.4.27 kernel. I guess the recent
kernel has no problem and #290772 can be closed.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
