On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Michael Schmitz wrote: > On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > ii libc6 2.0.7.19981211 GNU C Library: shared libraries > > is what I have. And what about gconv-modules? I guess we'll never get that > > unless we switch to glibc2.1 > > > > I do have an older locales version installed, so it does not bother me too > > much, but what about people installing from scratch once potato is finished? > > I hope the libc6 (>= 2.1.2) ist just a mistake and should really be >=2.0.7 > > or something? > > Correct me if I'm wrong - isn't the locale package libc version specific? > So the dependency should be on locale versions for libc >= 2.0.7 rather. I think Roman said no some time ago, I upgraded to a 2.1 locales. Working AFAIK. But if it was, there is no 2.0.7 locales since a very long time, locales seems to be a binary-all package, so "our" version was silently deleted when i386 switched to 2.1. Am I right? > I installed with kernel 2.0.36. From what I've seen, glibc 2.1 behaves OK > and I could install a number of glibc 2.0 packages without trouble. I > wouldn't object to switching to 2.1. Off-topic, but tell me in advance, when James comes visiting you, biting off your head ;-)
Ciao, Christian.
