Perhaps we should have kernel includes arranged like this:

/usr/include/linux -> 2.2.5/linux
/usr/include/asm -> 2.2.5/asm

The issue is kernel modules.  Right now, I think we require a user to
install kernel source for each kernel version they're using, and manually
deal with building the module for each such version.  Some people (Ted T'so
comes to mind) are actively campaigning that /usr/include/linux should
reflect the current running kernel, to address this issue.

Do you have any thoughts on this?  Is there some on-going discussion that's
already happening?

Thanks,

-- 
Raul



Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 11:19:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Portable binary drivers
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Raul Miller wrote:

> However, note that we don't have a general way of managing include
> files for the case where the user has more than one kernel version
> they'll be using on the system.

this presumes a tightly controlled and clean package system, like Debian's
or all the RPM based ones.

-- mingo

Reply via email to