On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 02:42:37PM +0200, Tuomas Jormola wrote: > Shouldn't you replace every "(>= 2.1.2)" with "(>= 2.1.3)" in > the libc6 shlibs file since the current stable upstream version > now is 2.1.3?
The shlibs file needs to be updated whenever backwards binary compatibility is broken (in fact, the SONAME should change, too, but this is glibc :). If this was not the case with 2.1.2->2.1.3 upgrade, there is no need to change the shlibs file. -- enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
