On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:50:02AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Hi, > > From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 12:46:08 -0400 > > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > > notes for the other ports (the ones I cannot build). > > Thanks for your efforts! > Some comments and questions about your new glibc 2.2 deb. > > * locale package have some missing conflicts/replaces entries. > Change your locale.deb package to > > Depends: libc6 (= 2.1.92-0.0.1) > Conflicts: localebin, wg15-locale, wcsmbs-locale-ja, libwcsmbs, locale-ja, > locale-ko, wcsmbs-locale-ko, locale-vi, locale-zh > Replaces: localebin, wg15-locale, libc6-bin, wcsmbs-locale-ja, libwcsmbs, > locale-ja, locale-ko, wcsmbs-locale-ko, locale-vi, locale-zh
Where did these packages come from? > * locale package have only a few locales as follow: > cs, da, de, el, en_GB, es, fr, gl, it, ko, > nl, no, pl, pt_BR, sk, sv > > However, we want to support more locales. Please add (at least) like: > af, af_ZA, ar_SA, bg, bg_BG.cp1251, br, ca, ca_ES, cs_CZ, cy, > da_DK, de_AT, de_BE, de_CH, de_DE, de_LU, el, el_GR, en, en_AU, > en_BW, en_CA, en_DK, en_IE, en_UK, en_US, en_ZW, eo, eo_EO, > es_AR, es_DO, es_ES, es_GT, es_HN, es_MX, es_PA, es_PE, es_SV, > et, et_EE, eu, eu_ES, fi, fi_FI, fo_FO, fr_BE, fr_CA, fr_CH, > fr_FR, fr_LU, ga, ga_IE, gd, gl_ES, gr, gv, he, hr, hr_HR, hs, > hu, hu_HU, id, in_ID, is, is_IS, it_CH, it_IT, iw_IL, ja, ja_JP, > ja_JP.eucJP, ja_JP.ujis, ja_JP.SJIS, kl_GL, kw, lt, lt_LT, lv, > lv_LV, mk, mk_MK, nl_BE, nl_NL, nn, [EMAIL PROTECTED], no_NO, pl_PL, > pt, pt_PT, ro, ro_RO, ru, ru_RU, ru_RU.KOI8-R, ru_UA, se, sk_SK, > sl, sl_SI, sp, sr, sr_YU, sv_FI, sv_SE, th, th_TH, tr, tr_TR, > uk, uk_UA, wa, zh, zh_CN, zh_CN.GB2312, zh_CN.GBK, zh_TW, zh_TW.Big5 > > Of cource, this list is very rough. One locale dir is only for storing > locale message catalog (ex. ja/), another is only link file > (ex. ja_JP.ujis -> ja_JP.eucJP), and so on. > glibc 2.2 has many locales, so we have to do efforts to support > various locales for our universal operating system, debian. I build what glibc builds by default. I'm not concered with additional locales at the moment. > * Where is "sln"? Is it not needed ? It is no longer build, so I assume so. > * glibc-2.1.9x is providing "rpcgen" program. Current rpcgen is > included in "netbase", but now, rpcgen should be supported into > libc package. Yes, it needs netbase changing... I'll leave that to the netbase maintainer to test and let me know. > > * BTW, your package does not have link file: ld.so (-> ld-linux.so.2). > Is this needed ? ld.so is for libc5, ld-linux.so.2 is for glibc 2. Some non-i386 archs have just ld.so though (since they never had libc5). That wont change. -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
