Ben, I forgot to mention that there should be no issues with building glibc with the previous patches under gcc < 3.1 as long as binutils, 2.12.90.0.14-1, or newer is installed. The libgcc-compat patch tickled a bug in binutils regarding weak symbols...
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-07/msg00285.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-07/msg00297.html That has been fixed in the current binutils. I mention this so you know adding the libgcc-compat patch shouldn't impact building glibc 2.2.5 with gcc < 3.1 (for a woody build for example). Jack -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
