Your message dated Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:13:40 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165319: Problem solved (see bug #165258)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2002 10:10:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 18 05:10:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 046.catv45.aar01.lan.ch (bolli.homeip.net) [212.60.45.46]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 182U5J-0007Cb-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 05:10:25 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bolli.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 939B767D93; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:09:53 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:09:45 +0200
From: Beat Bolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from bolli.homeip.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (AvMailGate-2.0.0.6) id 04772-5F57F6D5;
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:09:46 +0200
Received: by bolli.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8FBCB67E42; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:09:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: netkit-inetd: inetd does not find cyrus user anymore
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-AntiVirus: OK! AntiVir MailGate Version 2.0.0.6
at gw.bolli.homeip.net has not found any known virus in this email.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.5
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0
tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: *
Package: netkit-inetd
Version: 0.10-9
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Since upgrading to libc-2.3.1 this morning, IMAP and POP access are no
longer possible. The syslog entries look like this:
inetd[4717]: getpwnam: cyrus: No such user
The user cyrus exists in /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow. I use cyrus-imapd.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gw.bolli.homeip.net 2.4.18-586tsc #1 Sun Apr 14 10:57:57 EST 2002
i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages netkit-inetd depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- debconf information:
* netkit-inetd/inetd-dos-services: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165319-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2002 06:13:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 20 01:13:47 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
([3g/boTuEnXZNSFEAqS94AWE+FkLPFpxR])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1839LO-0003XS-00; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 01:13:46 -0500
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 56F13C33C1; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:13:40 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:13:40 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Beat Bolli), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#165319: Problem solved (see bug #165258)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
I really close this bug.
At Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:43:14 +0200,
Beat Bolli wrote:
> close 165319
> quit
>
> After restarting inetd, all was well again...
