Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2002 17:20:11 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: your mail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2002 22:37:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 04 16:37:42 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org [195.124.48.78]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 188pqn-00010d-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:37:42 -0600
Received: by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id B7E14366B22; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 23:37:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
from infodrom.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 23:28:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 23:28:54 +0100
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wrong Pre-Depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: coreutils
Version: 4.5.3-1
Severity: critical
I just tried to 'apt-get dist-upgrade' an m68k box and got bitten
by:
cut: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by cut)
It looks like coreutils are linked against a glibc 2.3 but only
Pre-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.5-13) which is not strict enough.
Please upload a new coreutils package so it gets properly rebuilt
on all architectures and please correct the pre-dependency.
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is too short to run proprietary software. -- Bdale Garbee
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167794-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 08:20:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 02 02:20:18 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
(postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18IloO-00020D-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 02:20:16 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460DAC33C6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 17:20:11 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 17:20:11 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: your mail
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Current libc6 (2.3.1-5) and coreutils (4.5.3-3) on m68k works fine.
-- gotom
