> I suppose what really confuses me is that the compat_symbol entries for > __ctype_* are commented out in RHL glibc, but not for __ctype32_*. > Why the asymmetry?
In the current RHL glibc sources, both are treated the same.
> I suppose what really confuses me is that the compat_symbol entries for > __ctype_* are commented out in RHL glibc, but not for __ctype32_*. > Why the asymmetry?
In the current RHL glibc sources, both are treated the same.