At Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:54:51 +0200 (EET), Martin--bÉric Racine wrote: > > At Sat, 14 Dec 2002 18:27:31 +0200 (EET), > > Martin--bïric Racine wrote: > > > > > Versions of packages libc6 depends on: > > > > > ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database > > > > > routines [gl > > > > > > > > Please send us more information, at least gtk+/sigseg apps/gdb version. > > > > I > > > > suspect your environment, it may be broken? Please recheck your machine > > > > before sending bug report. > > > > > > I doubt that very much. All my i386 and my hppa boxes experienced the > > > same > > > problem, as soon as libc6 2.3.1 forced itself as some package's > > > dependency. > > > > Then... how do we act about it? From this report, we can get only > > your complaints. Please send us each related package versions. > > From this report, you also got another report's tracking number, where I > include > a gdb trace (sylpheed). At least bother reading it, before saying that I did > not include anything to justify this.
Did you mean #110091? The reason I ignored it is that the original report mixes the issue with libc6 2.2.x and libc6 2.3.x. If your trace of gdb is still same with #110091, then the problem is X11 font related, I think. If other applications have the same behavior, I'm afraid it's not glibc but X11/GTK+1.2 problem. I downgrade it from critical to normal. > ii libc6 2.3.1-5 > ii xmms 1.2.7-1.1 > ii dia 0.90-2 > ii gaim 0.59.6-1 > ii gqview 1.0.2-1.1 > ii sylpheed 0.8.6-2 > ii gdb 5.2.cvs20020401-6 I believe many users use the same version... -- gotom
