At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:15:25 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:58:34PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:35:30PM -0600, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > > Not an objection, but I'd *suggest* you don't do this; the most important > > > thing to do to glibc at this point is to *fix* it (#174267, #167909 and > > > arm building at least, afaict), and the easiest and most reliable way to > > > do that is to make the minimal changes needed, and leave it at that. > > > > The reason I mentioned that one is that it's another localised fix to > > the regex engine which solves an infinite loop problem. I suspect that > > if it winds up in testing, we'll probably see a critical bug filed about > > it. > > > > Daniel fixed 174267 already. The -9 upload will have the fix. > > > > Hmm. For some reason I have in my notes here that 167909 was fixed and > > should have been closed. > > > > The CVS ChangeLog has it: > > > > - debian/patches/cvs.dpatch: Update. > > (Closes: #171550, #170507, #167909) > > > > But the one that got committed doesn't for some reasons. I also hadn't > > noticed it in the build log because it seems that bugs with tags appear > > near the bottom of the page. I'll have to remember to look there, too. > > > > I seem to recall GOTO removing it as a result of some discussion...?
Hmm... I forget this issue, and I wonder I joined the discussion about it... If 167909 is already fixed, I second to close it. Regards, -- gotom
