Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2001 19:48:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 13:48:48 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail3.aracnet.com [::ffff:216.99.193.38]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Tqs3-0007xm-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:48:47 -0600
Received: from charon.menefee (dyn-d082f5b3.spiritone.com [208.130.245.179])
by mail3.aracnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1GJmgb14949;
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:43 -0800
Received: from troglodyte
([192.168.192.3] helo=troglodyte.menefee ident=mail)
by charon.menefee with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14Tqrw-0001JY-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:40 -0800
Received: from kevint by troglodyte.menefee with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14Tqrr-0004CT-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:35 -0800
From: Kevin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: uppercase response to (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) does not work
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.13
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.13
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:48:32 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Kevin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.8.3.1
Severity: normal
Ok, I'm looking at the source, and I'm seeing that you've got a
"tolower" in main/configure.c:deferred_configure(), but I'm telling you,
uppercase reponses just aren't working for me here. Which wouldn't be
such a big deal, except that the prompt is all written in uppercase
letters.
(This is in response to the "File on system created by you or by a
script..." question.)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux troglodyte 2.4.1-pre12 #1 Tue Feb 13 15:49:08 PST 2001 i586
Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.0-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.3-5 The GNU stdc++ library
ii sysvinit 2.78-4 System-V like init.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 86220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2002 03:26:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 29 21:26:14 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
(postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18SqZC-0003PR-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:26:14 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D6668C33C1; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500,
H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tags 86220 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't
> reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I
> think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the
> bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't been able to reproduce
> it yet. Chances are it's not a bug. :-)
Yes :-)
It's time to close this bug.
-- gotom
