At Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:33:05 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > OoO Lors de la soir�e naissante du lundi 10 mars 2003, vers 17:16, > GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > > >> > Which machine did you upgrade? NFS server? NFS client? > >> > >> NFS client. > > > Interesting behavior. NFS client uses lockd to contact NFS server's > > lock manager as kernel thread. On the other hand glibc is on the > > userland, and issues lock funtion into kernel. So I wonder why > > upgrading libc6 causes such problem. It's hard to make nfs bad with > > upgrading glibc... > > I thought that glibc was the best option for a general breakage of > userland apps, but you are right, there was an upgrade of NFS the same > day in testing. So this bug should be reallocated to nfs package ?
Well, we don't give positive proof of nfs related package that is really guilty. But I think the nfs package maintainer knows about the nfs specific bugs. Please reassign this bug to your upgraded nfs packages. Regards, -- gotom
