Your message dated Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:37:19 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166728: Additionnal information has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 04:05:26 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 27 22:05:25 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (hades.dagami.org) [212.11.34.81] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18619Y-0005FG-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:05:24 -0600 Received: from hades.dagami.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hades.dagami.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) with ESMTP id g9S44qC6017560; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:04:52 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by hades.dagami.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) id g9S44qfV017558; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:04:52 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: nb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Segmentation fault in libc6 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:04:52 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-3 Severity: normal Tags: sid I've been using a prgram many years without problem. I have now a segmentation fault. strace shows this : open("/lib/ld-linux.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3 before the error. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux hades 2.4.19 #1 Sat Oct 26 22:58:35 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 166728-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2003 08:37:23 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 24 02:37:23 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18xNSL-0001id-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:37:21 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAE5C33C7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:37:19 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:37:19 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#166728: Additionnal information In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Fri, 07 Mar 2003 21:12:24 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# file /opt/AVP/Tools/checkurl > > /opt/AVP/Tools/checkurl: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version > > 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, statically linked, stripped > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd !$ > > ldd /opt/AVP/Tools/checkurl > > not a dynamic executable > > > > Is the problem related to statically linked programs? > > > > I tried gdb to have more informations but it gives nearly nothing. > > Your "checkurl" may be shell script. Look at "checkurl". Opening > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 is wierd, so your binary uses tricky technics. > > BTW, it seems that this bug report is about "non-free" software. I > can't solve any more. I plan to close this bug unless you show the > relation to the current glibc. I close this bug. -- gotom