At Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:04:10 +0200, era eriksson wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:21:39 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > At Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:36:13 +0200, > > era eriksson wrote: > >> It looks like there is a typo in the currency information for the _YU > >> locale. Attached please find a simple patch; however please note that > > I already sent this kind of patch to upstream a half of years before > > (2002-09-09), but I got comments that ar_SD, sr_YU, es_EC, ... is not > > established its int_curr_symbol name. I would like to know which > > currency symbol do the people use in those countries... > > It's silly to reject a patch which fixes a bug which prevents +any+ > use of these locales, and anyhow, I don't see how political reality > would be very important in this case, as having obsolete information > is hardly worse than not having any information at all. > > In any event, if localedef uses ISO 4217 as the reference for checking > the validity of the compiled locale, having the data conform to ISO > 4217 certainly +seems+ like the right thing to do (and when the Serbs > etc decide to have ISO 4217 updated with their new currency, it should > obviously be a simple matter to update +both+ the actual locale data > files and iso-4217.def so that they remain in agreement).
I know, I think so too. > For what it's worth, I have submitted patches to the apparent ultimate > upstream: > > * ar_SD - <http://www.jtcsv.com/cgibin/icu-bugs?findid=2763> > * sr_YU - <http://www.jtcsv.com/cgibin/icu-bugs?findid=2764> That's good :) Please tell me if your submission is accepted into the upstream. Regards, -- gotom
