At Thu, 3 Apr 2003 03:09:54 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 07:17:01PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > > > > > I don't know well, but TIOCFLUSH is not appropriate? > > > > > > yes it is (i just tried it after sending this report) > > > > Could you tell your results? > > I can tell that TIOCFLUSH solved the situation since the program i > was trying to build had support for both ioctl's. but other programs > might not.. shouldn't we have both?
"might not"? It seems that Hurd does not conform to sysv style _TCFLSH 0x5407. I think TIOCFLUSH is BSD's ioctl() interface argument number, and TCFLSH is linux (sysv)'s ioctl() interface argument number. Try to use tcflush(). I think it's ok that Hurd does not have any TCFLSH, but have tcflush(). Your program is needed to fix. I can say this bug can be closed, ok? Regards, -- gotom
