At 09 Apr 2003 11:21:44 +0200, Andreas Neudecker wrote: > > Are you es_EC user? I have never heard there are some es_EC users. > > BTW, I don't think it's not important. > > I am not a es_EC user myself. I just usually have all locales built on > the machines I maintain for the university machines I maintain (because > you never know where your next guest will be coming from, so you can > easily make everyone happy ;-). Also: If anybody has done something like > this (even if he/she doesn't need the locale, but simply thought "the > more the better", the upgrade to the current version fails - and the > package installation is suddenly corrupt. A downgrade back to 2.3.1-13 > was not possible either for me since this version was not on the Debian > ftp site (nor on my machine) any more. > > The only fix for a successful installation seemingly is to edit > /etc/locale.gen (i.e. comment-out the line for the delinquent, es_EC). > Then the installation will succeed. But this is certainly not obvious > for the average user, is it? (Also a user of es_EC would be quite > unhappy, i guess.)
Try to use "dpkg-reconfigure locales", then simply remove the check es_EC from locales debconf. > > > > Your message specified a Severity: in the pseudo-header, but > > > > the severity value important was not recognised. > > > ^^^^^^^^^ > > > > The default severity normal is being used instead. > > > > The recognised values are: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, > > > > minor, wishlist, fixed. > > > ^^^^^^^^^ > > But my mail regarding the "important" setting was rather about the > setting itself than the status of the bug report: As you can see from > the quote, the system claims "important" is not recognised, though it is > then listed in the list of recognised values few lines below in the same > error report. Also: I didn't TYPE the word "important" but selected the > value during creating the bugreport in "reportbug" - so somewhere there > seems to be a bug (a minor one, okay ;-). I just thought, I should > report it so it could be fixed. Ah, I see... I misunderstood you set as "important". Regards, -- gotom
