At Mon, 12 May 2003 12:58:27 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > Well, this seems an idea, but still many bugs are remained in BTS. > > > Debian glibc stores up many bugs. > > > > So what? As long as they're known to be fixed by 2.3.2, what's the > > big deal? Stalling all of sarge for the sake of closing a bunch of > > bugs in one package seems like a stunningly pyrrhic victory to me. > > > > It's not always _bugs_ that we're fighting. It's full out development. > Architectures not supported upstream have active development being > done within Debian/Others, which unfortuantely takes a lot of testing > and time.
I agree. I believe sarge adopt 2.3.2, unless sarge is released within a month. I think 2.3.2-1 provides much tests for such minor architectures. Regards, -- gotom
