Segundo os pergaminhos sagrados, alguÃm chamado Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Now, we need to find the problems I _don't_ know about. I'd like for those
> who feel comfortable testing a new glibc - usual caveats about the quality
> of experimental software! - to give it a try. Use it, let us know what
> happens. Don't upload Debian packages to the archive built against it,
> obviously - they won't be installable because of the >= 2.3.2.ds1 dependency
> in shlibs. If you have a kernel above 2.4.something, below 2.6, and an
> i686, you'll get i686 optimized libraries - er, I don't know if they'll work
> on a Via C3, I didn't check :( Probably not. If you have a kernel at least
> 2.6.0-test on an i486 or above, you'll get NPTL.
[Please CC me, I'm subscribed to debian-devel only]
I'm using 2.6.0-test8 (compiled myself, just don't like distro kernels) on a
K6-II (i586) and NTPL just doesn't work. After dpkg unpackaged the new libc6,
it stopped working. I tried to open aptitude again, and it said "Illegal
instruction". I tried to reboot but init failed just like the others -- had to
SysRq-S SysRq-U SysRq-B. After the (forced) reboot, init doesn't even print any
message.
After all these things, I tried my ol' 2.4.22. Yeah, it works! But not
optimized (i586 < i686)... So I downgraded libc6* and locales to unstable ones.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Felipe Almeida Lessa.
pgphasTprhMLg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
