On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Martin-�ric Racine wrote: > Package: linux-kernel-headers > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9 > Severity: important > > For example: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gfxdrivers/matrox -I../.. > -I../../../include -I../../../src -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -ffast-math -pipe > -DFUSION_FAKE -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -c > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c -fPIC -DPIC -o matrox_maven.lo > In file included from ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c:32: > /usr/include/linux/i2c-dev.h:37: error: field `__user' has incomplete type
Does adding an include of <linux/compiler.h> at the top of i2c-dev.h fix it? > /usr/include/linux/i2c-dev.h:37: error: parse error before '*' token > /usr/include/linux/i2c-dev.h:42: error: field `__user' has incomplete type > /usr/include/linux/i2c-dev.h:42: error: parse error before '*' token > /usr/include/linux/i2c-dev.h:44: error: parse error before '}' token > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c: In function `maven_write_byte': > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c:63: error: implicit declaration of > function `i2c_smbus_write_byte_data' > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c: In function `maven_write_word': > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c:80: error: implicit declaration of > function `i2c_smbus_write_word_data' > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c: In function `maven_open': > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c:311: error: `I2C_SLAVE' undeclared > (first use in this function) > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c:311: error: (Each undeclared > identifier is reported only once > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c:311: error: for each function it > appears in.) > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c: In function `maven_init': > ../../../gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_maven.c:450: error: `I2C_SLAVE' undeclared > (first use in this function) > make[4]: *** [matrox_maven.lo] Error 1 > > Given how libc6-dev has now become dependant upon > linux-kernel-headers (why the hell wasn't libc6-dev designed to > accomodate an existing and reliable kernel-headers-2.4.xx to fulfill > this dependency? ARGH!), I very much have to consider this an > important bug. Kindly read any of the hundred explanations of this decision in the -glibc or -devel archives before ranting about it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
