Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:07:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224419: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2003 20:42:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 18 14:42:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl [213.154.224.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AX4YD-0002vn-00; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:15:13 -0600
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (f52166.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.52.166])
by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBIKF37O000538
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:15:09 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elektron.atoom.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-5) with ESMTP id
hBIK6Nao002496;
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:06:23 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by elektron.atoom.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-5) id hBIK6Nuo002495;
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:06:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Miek Gieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:06:23 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Hello,
I'm seeing some very strange on my firewall (and only there). I'm
running testing/unstable there. When I tried to compile the kernel
this morning I got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
<empty>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make
HOSTCC scripts/docproc
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [scripts/docproc] Error 1
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib make
HOSTCC scripts/docproc
HOSTCC scripts/kallsyms
CC scripts/empty.o
HOSTCC scripts/mk_elfconfig
MKELF scripts/elfconfig.h
So explicitly setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH fixes this, but there is only on ld-linux
installed, so why I should matter...
I cannot even reproduce this on my server system, which is also running
testing/unstable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elektron 2.6.0 #5 Thu Dec 18 09:25:03 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 224419-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2003 03:35:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 18 21:35:51 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AXAz6-00023F-00; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:07:24 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian))
id 1AXAz5-0008Mz-A6; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:07:23 -0500
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:07:23 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Miek Gieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#224419: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=FOOASDF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:24:39AM +0100, Miek Gieben wrote:
> Well, I'm _totally_ blown away by this. For me the bug can be closed, guess we
> will never find out what was the actual cause of this.... :(
Just one of those things, I guess.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
