Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:10:29 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Sparc and POSIX saved ID's
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2002 20:55:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 14:55:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from soyouz.netaktiv.com (mail-aubervilliers) [80.67.162.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16W1l9-0007gj-00; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:55:11 -0600
Received: from spoutnik.internatif.org (unknown [62.212.103.139])
by mail-aubervilliers (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9E98D23E58; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:55:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: by spoutnik.internatif.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 67547FE22; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:55:08 +0100 (CET)
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: seteuid(0): Operation not permitted
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:55:07 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sudo
Version: 1.6.5p1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
sudo does not work at all (subject gives the error message). At first
glance, one could say that sudo is not setuid root but it is:
spoutnik:~ % ls -l /usr/bin/sudo
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 86840 Jan 19 00:50 /usr/bin/sudo
spoutnik:~ % sudo date
seteuid(0): Operation not permitted
I cannot strace it since I cannot trace setuid programs :-(
Probably Sparc-specific, I had no such problems on i386. If I have to
perform tests, that's fine, the machine is my desktop one.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux spoutnik 2.2.19 #1 Sat Jun 9 12:18:06 EDT 2001 sparc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR
Versions of packages sudo depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpam-modules 0.72-34 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam0g 0.72-34 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 131592-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2003 22:56:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 26 16:56:20 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aa0AA-0001Jv-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:10:31 -0600
Received: from hosts ([65.49.88.87])
by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:09:43 -0500
Subject: Sparc and POSIX saved ID's
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Grks75ERWMGg4MfYa0Ao"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:10:29 -0500
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at
fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:09:43 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
--=-Grks75ERWMGg4MfYa0Ao
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A quick test shows seteuid working on a current sparc system. Removing
the "grosshack" (*g*) section of the sudo rules file works fine. In the
absence of a better testcase, I'm closing this bug. Bdale - you can
feel free to remove that section of the sudo rules now.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--=20
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been
misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe.
- Bruce Schneier
--=-Grks75ERWMGg4MfYa0Ao
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA/7LHV5M5hmdCYCpkRAmclAJ0S4hqfXUfRMK6DOXaMXipB5UCuUACgp7Yh
LqUEgDWU7WF+YfUgikdQ+9w=
=//2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Grks75ERWMGg4MfYa0Ao--
