Why doesn't glibc round all stack limit settings to the next lower multiple of the page size? Sounds straightforward and safe enough to me. Sort of kludgy, in some ways, I admit.
If it's setting the stack *limit* and glibc is complaining because the
stack *size* isn't a multiple of the page size...
Why doesn't glibc round all stack limit settings to the next lower multiple of the page size? Sounds straightforward and safe enough to me. Sort of kludgy, in some ways, I admit.
Why doesn't glibc round all stack limit settings to the next lower multiple of the page size? Sounds straightforward and safe enough to me. Sort of kludgy, in some ways, I admit.
- Bug#223441: Way to go for this bug?... Nathanael Nerode
- Bug#223441: Way to go for this bug?... Daniel Jacobowitz
- Bug#223441: Way to go for this bug?... Jeff Bailey
