At Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:13:45 -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > We were holding off a new cvs update until the Sarge release. That > doesn't appear to be soon, since there are still buildds that are > offline. Also, given drepper's reluctance to ever release a new > version, and prediction of no major changes in the near future[0], it > seems that doing a cvs update might not only be worth doing, but also be > relatively safe.
I also think we should keep holding off, unless sarge will not be released over 3 or 4 months. > Also, we have 88 dpatch files right now. It's a bit daunting. > > Assuming consensus, I would prepare this as 2.3.3-1 [1] for experimental > for ia64, sparc and alpha, and do it for i386 as soon as it can be built > again. We now have excessively good bandwidth at work, so if there's > tests people want run like "Build the archive", I can do those now. IMHO, making such newer version sounds good for me, but I concern we need to maintain two trees... Regards, -- gotom
