At Mon, 17 May 2004 14:03:30 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:17:53AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I also fully agreed. The latest kernel uses __STRICT_ANSI__ in only > > types.h and byteorder.h for each architecture. But there are a lot of > > __s64 and __u64 use without __STRICT_ANSI__ ifdefs in the kernel > > headers even if that clause is excluded from __KERNEL__. This means > > that we don't care about this problem. And nowadays we're moving > > standard to ISO C99, and that includes "long long". > > > > The only remained problem is: the default standard of gcc 3.3 is not > > ISO C99. But "long long" works with even gcc 2.95.3 (which is at > > least required for kernel 2.6 compilation). So it's not exact > > problem. > > > > Attached patch removes all __STRICT_ANSI__ from the latest kernel > > 2.6.6 and today's bk. I'll ask it to lkml and put this patch into lkh > > cvs, if you have no objection. > > Have you tried building lkh with this patch? The included testsuite > will fail unless I'm very confused. If you remove the __STRICT_ANSI__, > you will need to add strategic uses of __extension__.
Of course I built it. Could you show me your build log? Regards, -- gotom
