Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 01:59:04 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#223460: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopening]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2003 16:52:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 09 10:52:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ATkSa-0006Zr-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:11:40 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by colo.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD6A29804B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:11:39 -0700 (MST)
Received: from colo.lackof.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (colo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 09161-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:11:38 -0700 (MST)
Received: by colo.lackof.org (Postfix, from userid 1012)
id 470B329804A; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:11:38 -0700 (MST)
X-IMAP-Sender: dannf
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:09:51 -0700
X-OfflineIMAP-1043145303-64616e6e662e6f72672e72656d6f7465-494e424f582e4f7574626f78:
1070986298-0636983158175
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopening]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at lackof.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
oops - tried to reopen an archived bug.
opening a new one instead. see #218645 for the original report.
----- Forwarded message from dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: reopening
this bug exists in unstable - dunno if its a regression or if it wasn't
fixed the first time.
...
gcc -O2 -Wall -I../../../util/../include -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DCONFIG_ROOT_CHECK_OFF=0 -DELF_MACHINE_H='"elf_ia64.h"' -DARCH_ia64 -c -o
arch64.o ../../../util/arch64.c
In file included from ../../../util/arch64.c:24:
../../../include/util.h:42: warning: built-in function `log' declared as
non-function
gcc -O2 -Wall -I../../../util/../include -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DCONFIG_ROOT_CHECK_OFF=0 -DELF_MACHINE_H='"elf_ia64.h"' -DARCH_ia64 -c -o
gzfiles.o ../../../util/gzfiles.c
gcc -O2 -Wall -I../../../util/../include -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DCONFIG_ROOT_CHECK_OFF=0 -DELF_MACHINE_H='"elf_ia64.h"' -DARCH_ia64 -c -o
sys_nim.o ../../../util/sys_nim.c
gcc -O2 -Wall -I../../../util/../include -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DCONFIG_ROOT_CHECK_OFF=0 -DELF_MACHINE_H='"elf_ia64.h"' -DARCH_ia64 -c -o
sys_oim.o ../../../util/sys_oim.c
../../../util/sys_oim.c:36: error: parse error before "old_sys_init_module"
make[2]: *** [sys_oim.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/modutils-2.4.25/debian/build/util'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/modutils-2.4.25/debian/build'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/modutils-2.4.25$ COLUMNS=100 dpkg -l | grep libc6.1
ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10.0.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and
Timezone data
ii libc6.1-dbg 2.3.2.ds1-10.0.1 GNU C Library: Libraries with
debugging symbols
ii libc6.1-dev 2.3.2.ds1-10.0.1 GNU C Library: Development
Libraries and Header Files
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/modutils-2.4.25$ COLUMNS=100 dpkg -l linux-kernel-headers
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-===================-===================-======================================================
ii linux-kernel-header 2.5.999-test7-bk-9 Linux Kernel Headers for development
----- End forwarded message -----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 223460-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2004 16:57:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 28 09:57:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from megaela.srvf.org [210.251.64.91]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTkgA-0007w2-00; Fri, 28 May 2004 09:57:58 -0700
Received: (qmail 8335 invoked from network); 28 May 2004 16:57:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rhodes.gotom.jp) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 28 May 2004 16:57:56 -0000
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 01:59:04 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#223460: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopening]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0
(SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Fri, 28 May 2004 10:45:20 -0600,
LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 01:39:21AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Is this bug alive? Moreover, is this really linux-kernel-headers bug?
> > The latest modutils on ia64 is existed, so it can be closed, I think.
>
> I see no reason to keep it open.
Thanks for your comments, I've closed this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
