tags 256770 confirmed thanks Hi,
At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:50:42 +1000, Duraid Madina wrote: > #204805 is fixed now. Thanks for your quick reply. I close it now. > #256770 is a new bug. But the problem may not be > with the Intel compiler. Why are symbols multiply defined in libc.a?? It > seems a mistake. Yeah, that's right. I confirmed there're a lot of multiple symbol definition... I have no idea why duplicate symbols are existed. It needs investigation... Regards, -- gotom
