On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:46:24AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200, > Bastian Blank wrote: > > Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of > > problems may the different glibc packages. But I currently see nothing > > which may really cause problems here as ld.so is not effected. (See this > > as a small part of the upgrade to 2.3.4, with the exception that you > > don't break the compatiblity between ld.so and libc.so.6.) > > Yes, exactly, thinking about "upgrade to 2.3.4", it should not make a > problem. > > I'm rathar a bit nervous of supporting this special situation (ex: > distro compatibility and so on) because -21 should be the last call > for sarge stuff...
Could you explain what it is you're worried about? We absolutely ought to have this patch... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]