Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:37:47 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Seems done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 00:45:25 2006 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2006 08:45:25 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ip127.bb146.pacific.net.hk ([202.64.146.127] helo=mailhub.stlglobal.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ey3Vs-0004UC-Ur; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:45:25 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.stlglobal.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ey3VG-0007Ot-Ra; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:44:47 +0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:44:50 +0800 From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] Subject: [patch/hppa] Floating point exception handling patch Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080603060102010305030304" Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080603060102010305030304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: glibc Version: 2.3.5-11 Severity: important Tags: patch The attached patch fixes a problem with floating point exception handling on hppa. This affects packages that use feholdexcept and fesetenv, such as uic from QT. This patch fixes #342545. Carlos is on vacation now - I'll ask him to merge this upstream when he returns, meanwhile perhaps somebody can roll a new glibc package for debian? randolph --------------080603060102010305030304 Content-Type: text/plain; name="glibc235-hppa-fpu.dpatch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="glibc235-hppa-fpu.dpatch" #! /bin/sh -e # DP: Description: hppa floating point exception handling fix # DP: Related bugs: Debian #342545 # DP: Dpatch author: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # DP: Patch author: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # DP: Upstream status: Pending # DP: Status Details: to be merged by Carlos # DP: Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 PATCHLEVEL=1 if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" exit 1 fi case "$1" in -patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; -unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; *) echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" exit 1 esac exit 0 # append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls. diff -uNr glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu.orig/fegetenv.c glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu/fegetenv.c --- glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu.orig/fegetenv.c 2006-01-14 10:17:19.000000000 -0800 +++ glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu/fegetenv.c 2006-01-14 10:19:08.000000000 -0800 @@ -27,10 +27,7 @@ unsigned long long buf[4], *bufptr = buf; __asm__ ( - "fstd,ma %%fr0,8(%1)\n" - "fstd,ma %%fr1,8(%1)\n" - "fstd,ma %%fr2,8(%1)\n" - "fstd %%fr3,0(%1)\n" + "fstd %%fr0,0(%1)\n" : "=m" (buf), "+r" (bufptr)); memcpy (envp, buf, sizeof (*envp)); return 0; diff -uNr glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu.orig/feholdexcpt.c glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu/feholdexcpt.c --- glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu.orig/feholdexcpt.c 2006-01-14 10:17:19.000000000 -0800 +++ glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu/feholdexcpt.c 2006-01-14 10:20:21.000000000 -0800 @@ -30,10 +30,7 @@ /* Store the environment. */ bufptr = clear.buf; __asm__ ( - "fstd,ma %%fr0,8(%1)\n" - "fstd,ma %%fr1,8(%1)\n" - "fstd,ma %%fr2,8(%1)\n" - "fstd %%fr3,0(%1)\n" + "fstd %%fr0,0(%1)\n" : "=m" (clear), "+r" (bufptr)); memcpy (envp, &clear.env, sizeof (fenv_t)); @@ -47,10 +44,7 @@ /* Load the new environment. */ bufptr = clear.buf; __asm__ ( - "fldd,ma 8(%0),%%fr0\n" - "fldd,ma 8(%0),%%fr1\n" - "fldd,ma 8(%0),%%fr2\n" - "fldd 0(%0),%%fr3\n" + "fldd 0(%0),%%fr0\n" : : "r" (bufptr), "m" (clear)); return 0; diff -uNr glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu.orig/fesetenv.c glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu/fesetenv.c --- glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu.orig/fesetenv.c 2006-01-14 10:17:19.000000000 -0800 +++ glibc-2.3.5/sysdeps/hppa/fpu/fesetenv.c 2006-01-14 10:20:44.000000000 -0800 @@ -34,10 +34,7 @@ we want to use from the environment specified by the parameter. */ bufptr = temp.buf; __asm__ ( - "fstd,ma %%fr0,8(%1)\n" - "fstd,ma %%fr1,8(%1)\n" - "fstd,ma %%fr2,8(%1)\n" - "fstd %%fr3,0(%1)\n" + "fstd %%fr0,0(%1)\n" : "=m" (temp), "+r" (bufptr)); temp.env.__status_word &= ~(FE_ALL_EXCEPT @@ -56,9 +53,6 @@ /* Load the new environment. */ bufptr = temp.buf; __asm__ ( - "fldd,ma -8(%1),%%fr3\n" - "fldd,ma -8(%1),%%fr2\n" - "fldd,ma -8(%1),%%fr1\n" "fldd 0(%1),%%fr0\n" : "=m" (temp), "+r" (bufptr)); --------------080603060102010305030304--
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 06 18:37:36 2006 Received: (at 348136-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2006 02:37:36 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.vif.com ([216.239.64.153] helo=buddha.vif.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F6IjW-0000Tt-IK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:37:36 -0800 Received: from [216.239.86.34] (ip216-239-86-34.vif.net [216.239.86.34]) by buddha.vif.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k172bWOn001651 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:37:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:37:47 -0500 From: Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Seems done Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-vif-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-vif-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-vif-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 2.3.5-13 Hi Randolph. Thanks for submitting this patch. LaMont Jones uploaded 2.3.5-12.1 which fixed the problem, as you may know. The changelog doesn't mention this bug nor your name, but the patch's name is the same as yours, so it seems to be your patch applied. If this is not the case, and you think something should still be done, please consider reopening.
--- End Message ---
