tag 356735 + wontfix thanks On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:40:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: glibc > Severity: wishlist > > I've tested what would be the size saving when building glibc with -Os: > > $ du -h */*udeb > 1020K normal/libc6-udeb_2.3.6-3_amd64.udeb > 12K normal/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.6-3_amd64.udeb > 20K normal/libnss-files-udeb_2.3.6-3_amd64.udeb > 888K tiny/libc6-udeb_2.3.6-3_amd64.udeb > 12K tiny/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.6-3_amd64.udeb > 16K tiny/libnss-files-udeb_2.3.6-3_amd64.udeb > > For the udeb I think it's significant. I would suggest adding a build pass > for > -Os (and possibly other tinification options), and use that to prepare the > udebs. > > What do you think? Would you like a patch for this? >
All the tests have shown that the resulting packages are mostly broken, the level of brokeness, depending on the architecture and the version of the glibc. I am therefore tagging this bug as wontfix. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
