David Baron a écrit : > On Wednesday 25 April 2007, you wrote: >> Aurelien Jarno a écrit : >>> d_bron a écrit : >>>> Package: libc6 >>>> Version: 2.5-4 >>>> Severity: critical >>>> Justification: breaks unrelated software >>>> >>>> Once again, with feeling. >>>> 1. Attempt to fix up dependencies and upgrade using apt -4 install. As >>>> soon as it attempted to actually install this library, if failed with sh >>>> looking for one of those lib....so.# which are no longer in /usr/lib. >> Once again *.so files are need for linking, but they are not needed at >> runtime. bash could even run without /usr/lib. >> >>>> 2. So installed libc6 only (ok, afterwards, locale and other things need >>>> be upgraded as well, but...) using dpkg -i. This succedes. Now bash can >>>> no longer process bashrc files and any attempt to run simple commands >>>> (except for cd) looks for those numberd .so libraries. Same problem as >>>> in previous bug report. >>>> >>>> So I will once more downgrade to 2.3.*. Little harm done. >>>> >>>> Time to get to the bottom of this, please. >>> Please send us the output of: >>> >>> ls -l /lib /lib/tls /usr/lib/*-2.3.6* /usr/lib/*-2.5* >> I mean after the installation of libc6 2.5-4. > > I will attach them: > ls-lib contains the result of ls /lib
Could you do the same with ls -l ? > usrlib2.5 contains the result of ls /usr/lib/*-2.5* Please remove /usr/lib/libc-2.5.so. It should not be here. > After the installation of 2.5.4, there is no more /lib/tls !! could this be > the problem? That's normal. > There are no *-2.3.6* entries. Ok that's normal. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
