Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:43:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421277: libc6: upgrade from 2.5-2 to 2.5-4 fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (630, 'stable'), (560, 'unstable'), (500,
'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (490, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
-- no debconf information
This bug could be related to #419189 or #419879 but gives another error
message.
On April 19th, I upgraded from libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 to 2.5-2 without finding any
problems afterwards. The upgrade from there to version 2.5-4 fails, however,
leaving a broken package libc6-dev, which already has been successfully
upgraded to 2.5-4, while libc6 itsself and lib6-686 have not.
dpkg's message:
"A non-dpkg owned copy of the C library was found in /lib/tls.
It is not safe to upgrade the C library in this situation;
please remove that copy of the C library and try again.
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.5-4_i386.deb (--unpack):
Unterprozess pre-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück"
Regards, Christoph
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Christoph Franzen a écrit :
> Am 27 Apr 2007 um 16:51 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
>
> Bonjour Aurelien,
>
>> Could you please give us the output of:
>>
>> ls -l /lib/tls
>
> voilà:
>
> christoph9:~# ls -l /lib/tls/
> insgesamt 1940
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2004-12-27 03:41 ld-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-04-30 20:56 ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-
> 2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9324 2004-12-27 03:41 libanl-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2007-04-19 23:47 libanl.so.1 -> libanl-
> 2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3552 2004-12-27 03:41 libBrokenLocale-
> 2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2007-04-19 23:47 libBrokenLocale.so.1 ->
> libBrokenLocale-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1253924 2004-12-27 03:41 libc-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18876 2004-12-27 03:41 libcrypt-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2007-04-19 23:47 libcrypt.so.1 ->
> libcrypt-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2007-04-19 23:47 libc.so.6 -> libc-
> 2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9872 2004-12-27 03:41 libdl-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2007-04-19 23:47 libdl.so.2 -> libdl-
> 2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 134464 2004-12-27 03:41 libm-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2007-04-19 23:47 libm.so.6 -> libm-
> 2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73304 2004-12-27 03:41 libnsl-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2007-04-19 23:47 libnsl.so.1 -> libnsl-
> 2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28648 2004-12-27 03:41 libnss_compat-
> 2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2007-04-19 23:47 libnss_compat.so.2 ->
> libnss_compat-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13976 2004-12-27 03:41 libnss_dns-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2007-04-19 23:47 libnss_dns.so.2 ->
> libnss_dns-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34748 2004-12-27 03:41 libnss_files-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 2007-04-19 23:47 libnss_files.so.2 ->
> libnss_files-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14220 2004-12-27 03:41 libnss_hesiod-
> 2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2007-04-19 23:47 libnss_hesiod.so.2 ->
> libnss_hesiod-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 33440 2004-12-27 03:41 libnss_nis-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39672 2004-12-27 03:41 libnss_nisplus-
> 2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 2007-04-19 23:47 libnss_nisplus.so.2 ->
> libnss_nisplus-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2007-04-19 23:47 libnss_nis.so.2 ->
> libnss_nis-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 78233 2004-12-27 03:41 libpthread-0.60.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2007-04-19 23:47 libpthread.so.0 ->
> libpthread-0.60.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64924 2004-12-27 03:41 libresolv-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2007-04-19 23:47 libresolv.so.2 ->
> libresolv-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 22940 2004-12-27 03:41 librt-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2007-04-19 23:47 librt.so.1 -> librt-
> 2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7828 2004-12-27 03:41 libutil-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2007-04-19 23:47 libutil.so.1 ->
> libutil-2.3.2.so
>
> As you can see, the symlinks seem to have been created when the
> upgrade from "etch/stable" to version 2.5-2 took place.
>
Yep they have been created by ldconfig because after the removal of the
libc 2.3.6, the newest available libaries were the 2.3.2 ones.
This is actually a bug of your system, those files should not be there,
please remove them (rm -rf /lib/tls). This shows that the test is
working correctly, though in some cases (fortunately for you) they don't
break the system.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
