FYI. I guess the consensus on the clone unwind info patch was that
GCC needed some work first, or something like that...
----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----
Date: 31 Jul 2007 12:51:32 -0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc ./ChangeLog sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/ ...
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVSROOT: /cvs/glibc
Module name: libc
Branch: glibc-2_6-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-31 12:51:32
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386: clone.S
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64: clone.S
Log message:
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S: Revert 2006-11-30 changes.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S: Likewise.
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=glibc&only_with_tag=glibc-2_6-branch&r1=1.10640.2.2&r2=1.10640.2.3
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S.diff?cvsroot=glibc&only_with_tag=glibc-2_6-branch&r1=1.27&r2=1.27.2.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S.diff?cvsroot=glibc&only_with_tag=glibc-2_6-branch&r1=1.7&r2=1.7.2.1
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
