On 2007-12-25 21:38:48 +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > I was under the impression that it was conventional even if not required > to reserve host zero in a given subnet to identify the network itself, > to avoid confusion of networks with hosts.
I thought for this reason 1.0.0.0 could be detected as not corresponding to a hostname. Now, if I understand correctly (but I've only partial information about the problem), the problem occurs with IPv6 DNS requests only, but 1.0.0.0 is an IPv4 address. So, I suppose that there could be a workaround. And FYI, there doesn't seem to be any firmware upgrade for the router (D-Link DSL-924). -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
