On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:36:49PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > (The only serious argument I've heard boils down to: some IPv4 setups > are broken by NAT and icky firewalls, and IPv6 isn't. One non-serious > argument I've heard is: if IPv6 is not preferred then the v6 network > will not get exercised.)
Yes, let's deploy IPv6, but also make sure that nobody use it! -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
